Comments on: Your Project is Not the Science Fair http://approach.botonomy.com/2006/05/15/your-project-is-not-the-science-fair/ The ABCs of Modern Project Management and Software Delivery (or at least our take on them) Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:28:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.12-alpha by: viagraFarfoormacher http://approach.botonomy.com/2006/05/15/your-project-is-not-the-science-fair/#comment-14387 Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:31:06 +0000 http://approach.botonomy.com/2006/05/15/your-project-is-not-the-science-fair/#comment-14387 The approach.botonomy.com is interesting resource, thanks, admin. viagra <a href="http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/member.php?u=149853" rel="nofollow"> viagra </a> pills. The approach.botonomy.com is interesting resource, thanks, admin.
viagra viagra pills.

]]> by: Daniel http://approach.botonomy.com/2006/05/15/your-project-is-not-the-science-fair/#comment-7484 Wed, 15 Aug 2007 04:25:04 +0000 http://approach.botonomy.com/2006/05/15/your-project-is-not-the-science-fair/#comment-7484 I couldn't understand some parts of this article Your Project is Not the Science Fair, but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting. I couldn’t understand some parts of this article Your Project is Not the Science Fair, but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting.

]]> by: Science Fair Projects http://approach.botonomy.com/2006/05/15/your-project-is-not-the-science-fair/#comment-7437 Fri, 10 Aug 2007 07:56:44 +0000 http://approach.botonomy.com/2006/05/15/your-project-is-not-the-science-fair/#comment-7437 Hey, I still think perl is great. It helps me with science data mining and XML databases. awesome post... Hey, I still think perl is great. It helps me with science data mining and XML databases.

awesome post…

]]> by: Lauren http://approach.botonomy.com/2006/05/15/your-project-is-not-the-science-fair/#comment-499 Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:15:25 +0000 http://approach.botonomy.com/2006/05/15/your-project-is-not-the-science-fair/#comment-499 Nice Topic… this was a great Idea that whgat went wrong with the projects….I will go thru the critical chain again after reading this post. Nice Topic… this was a great Idea that whgat went wrong with the projects….I will go thru the critical chain again after reading this post.

]]> by: iris http://approach.botonomy.com/2006/05/15/your-project-is-not-the-science-fair/#comment-254 Thu, 12 Oct 2006 00:09:39 +0000 http://approach.botonomy.com/2006/05/15/your-project-is-not-the-science-fair/#comment-254 hey people i didnt know this thins actually worked!!!!!wow!!!!! hey people i didnt know this thins actually worked!!!!!wow!!!!!

]]> by: iris http://approach.botonomy.com/2006/05/15/your-project-is-not-the-science-fair/#comment-253 Thu, 12 Oct 2006 00:08:52 +0000 http://approach.botonomy.com/2006/05/15/your-project-is-not-the-science-fair/#comment-253 well i thim=nk that Perl is cool and is educatine...thank you... well i thim=nk that Perl is cool and is educatine…thank you…

]]> by: ghenry http://approach.botonomy.com/2006/05/15/your-project-is-not-the-science-fair/#comment-8 Thu, 15 Jun 2006 19:06:18 +0000 http://approach.botonomy.com/2006/05/15/your-project-is-not-the-science-fair/#comment-8 Perl Rocks. But I mean, what about C? That's old, but it's still used. Heavily. Just stear clear from "Flavour of the Month" ;-) Perl Rocks. But I mean, what about C? That’s old, but it’s still used. Heavily.

Just stear clear from “Flavour of the Month” ;-)

]]> by: Nebulous http://approach.botonomy.com/2006/05/15/your-project-is-not-the-science-fair/#comment-7 Thu, 15 Jun 2006 19:03:41 +0000 http://approach.botonomy.com/2006/05/15/your-project-is-not-the-science-fair/#comment-7 Hi. I also think that Perl rocks. Hard. Thank you. Hi. I also think that Perl rocks. Hard. Thank you.

]]> by: Nilson Santos F. Jr. http://approach.botonomy.com/2006/05/15/your-project-is-not-the-science-fair/#comment-6 Thu, 15 Jun 2006 17:05:12 +0000 http://approach.botonomy.com/2006/05/15/your-project-is-not-the-science-fair/#comment-6 Note that Perl is "over a decade old", but it's something that's constantly developed and upgraded. So it's not something of the past. It even offers all these bells and whistles of the new "Science Fair" languages if that's what you want. This thing is a meme that should disappear. The upcoming Perl 6 is still Perl, but it'll be a really different language. There'll will be syntax changes (adding new operators) between Perl 5.8 and Perl 5.10. It's not something static. So, there's no problem in being "over a decade old" if you're constantly upgraded (and, besides, one decade ago it already had all these features that are only now appearing in languages such as Ruby). In fact, the post points out, it's even something good, because it's a tried and tested technology. Note that Perl is “over a decade old”, but it’s something that’s constantly developed and upgraded. So it’s not something of the past. It even offers all these bells and whistles of the new “Science Fair” languages if that’s what you want.

This thing is a meme that should disappear. The upcoming Perl 6 is still Perl, but it’ll be a really different language. There’ll will be syntax changes (adding new operators) between Perl 5.8 and Perl 5.10.

It’s not something static. So, there’s no problem in being “over a decade old” if you’re constantly upgraded (and, besides, one decade ago it already had all these features that are only now appearing in languages such as Ruby). In fact, the post points out, it’s even something good, because it’s a tried and tested technology.

]]> by: Retrospector http://approach.botonomy.com/2006/05/15/your-project-is-not-the-science-fair/#comment-5 Thu, 15 Jun 2006 16:06:46 +0000 http://approach.botonomy.com/2006/05/15/your-project-is-not-the-science-fair/#comment-5 This article humorously reminds me of the basis on a recent post I made on <a href="http://www.retrospector.com/2006/06/09/building-a-reputation-knowing-when-to-experiment-and-when-to-deliver/" rel="nofollow">knowing when to experiment and when to deliver</a>. Regardless of language, I think the point is that you need to rely on what you know will make the deadline and what won't. Understanding that the "Foo of the month" isn't always the best choice isn't emphasized enough. Nice post. This article humorously reminds me of the basis on a recent post I made on knowing when to experiment and when to deliver. Regardless of language, I think the point is that you need to rely on what you know will make the deadline and what won’t. Understanding that the “Foo of the month” isn’t always the best choice isn’t emphasized enough. Nice post.

]]>